6. SOIL WATER BALANCE
Plant production involves CO_{2} intake through stomatal openings in the epidermis. Most water that plants take up from the soil is again lost to the atmosphere by transpiration through the same openings. The daily turnover can be considerable: transpiration from 0.4 cm of water from a crop surface on a clear sunny day corresponds with a water loss from the root zone of than 40.000 kg ha^{1} d^{1}. If soil moisture uptake by the roots is not replenished, the soil will dry out to such an extent that the plants wilt and  ultimately die.The tenacity with which the soil retains its water is equalled by the suction which roots must exert to be able to take up soil moisture. This suction known as the soil moisture potential or 'matrix suction', can be measured. In hydrology, the potential is usually used and is expressed as energy unit per weight of soil water, with the dimension of length (van Bakel, 1981). An optimum range exists within which the plant takes up water freely. Above or below this level the plant senses stress; it reacts by actively curbing its daily water consumption through partial or complete closure of the stomata. The consequence is evident: this stomatal closure interferes with CO_{2} intake and reduces assimilation and dry matter production consequently.
A crop growth simulation model must therefore keep track of the soil moisture potential to determine when and to what degree a crop is exposed to water stress. This is commonly done with the aid of a water balance equation, which compares for a given period of time, incoming water in the rooted soil with outgoing water and quantifies the difference between the two as a change in the soil moisture amount stored.
Therefore the purpose of soil water balance calculations is to estimate daily value of the actual soil moisture content, which influences soil moisture uptake and crop transpiration.
Figure 6.1. Schematic representation of the different components of a soil water balance
Actual soil moisture content can be established according to (Driessen, 1986):
(6.1a)

where  (6.1b)


and  (6.1c)

where  q_{t}  :  Actual moisture content of the root zone at time step t  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
IN_{up}  :  Rate of net influx through the upper root zone boundary  [cm d^{1}]  
IN_{low}  :  Rate of net influx through the lower root zone boundary  [cm d^{1}]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate of crop  [cm d^{1}]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
P  :  Precipitation intensity  [cm d^{1}]  
I_{e}  :  Effective daily irrigation  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Soil evaporation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
SS_{t}  :  Surface storage  [cm]  
SR  :  Rate of surface runoff  [cm d^{1}]  
CR  :  Rate of capillary rise  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d]  
Z_{t}  :  Depth of groundwater table (see Figure 6.1.)  [cm] 
The processes directly affecting the root zone soil moisture content can be defined as:
 infiltration: i.e. transport from the soil surface into the root zone;
 evaporation: i.e. the loss of soil moisture to the atmosphere;
 plant transpiration: i.e. loss of water from the interior root zone;
 percolation: i.e. downward transport of water from the root zone to the layer below the root zone;
 capillary rise: i.e. upward transport into the rooted zone.
So, actually three water balance subroutines can be distinguished:
 Potential production [Section 6.2.]
 Water limited production, without groundwater influence [Section 6.3. ]
 Water limited production, with groundwater influence [Section 6.4.]
In the water limited situation the water content of the root zone is the most important state variable, in and outflow of water is calculated for each time step. It is important to realize that the model is not intended for detailed physical treatment of water movement in the soil, but only for estimating moisture availability to the crop. The distribution of water within the root zone is assumed to be instantaneous (within the time step of the model, being one day). The available water contained in the rooted zone is directly at the disposal of the crop. Water just below the root zone is available after further root growth. Water below the potential rooting depth cannot be used by the crop.
The infiltration process is not treated in a physical sense, because it would require a much smaller time step (Rietveld, 1978; Stroosnijder et al., 1972; van Keulen & van Beek, 1971). Instead a predefined fraction of the rain is not infiltrating on the day of rainfall (van Diepen et al., 1988).
Soil water content at saturation is equal to soil porosity. Field capacity
is the volumetric water content of the soil after wetting and initial redistribution
(Veihmeyer & Hendrickson, 1931). It is often treated as a soil characteristic
(van Keulen, 1975; Driessen, 1986; Jansen & Gosseye, 1986), although
it also depends on boundary conditions. Field capacity is usually defined
as the volumetric water content at a soil moisture suction of 100 mbar
or pF 2.0 at least in the Netherlands. It is the moisture suction in equilibrium
with a groundwater table at 100 cm. Elsewhere in the world, for loamy soils
field capacity corresponds with a value of 200 mbar moisture suction. For
sandy soils 60 mbar is a realistic value under field conditions. Above
a certain value of moisture suction, plants do not recover and wilt permanently.
The volumetric soil water content at this point is called wilting
point. The soil moisture at wilting point has usually a value of about
16000 mbar or pF 4.2. The soil moisture content of an air dry soil is assumed
to be at pF 7.0 (van Keulen, 1975).
6.1. Evapo(transpi)ration
The following processes are calculated for a given crop cover (module CEvTra): The maximum evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface
 The maximum evaporation rate from a shaded water surface
 The maximum crop transpiration rate;
 The actual crop transpiration rate.
Evaporation and transpiration
Potential crop evapotranspiration, ET0, is the sum of potential transpiration T_{m} and soil evaporation E0_{s}.
(6.2) 
Where  ET0  :  Potential evapotranspiration rate (see Section 4.1.4.)  [cm d^{1}] 
E0_{s}  :  Potential evaporation of a bare soil (see Section 4.1.4.)  [cm d^{1}]  
T_{m}  :  Maximum crop transpiration rate (see eq. 6.4)  [cm d^{1}] 
For some crops the potential evapotranspiration can be higher than the Penman evapotranspiration. Therefore, in the model a correction factor, a so called crop coefficient is introduced to account for this effect. The Penman evapotranspiration should be multiplied by this crop coefficient (Feddes, 1978; Doorenbos & Pruitt, 1977). The evaporation is reduced due to the presence of vegetation, which intercepts the solar energy and reduces the windspeed. The evaporation of the soil as a function of the leaf area index (Goudriaan, 1977; Ritchie, 1972; 1971) can be estimated as:
(6.3) 
Where  E0_{s}  :  Potential bare soil evaporation  [cm d^{1}] 
k_{gb}  :  Extinction coefficient for global radiation  []  
LAI  :  Leaf area index  [ha ha^{1}] 
The potential transpiration rate can be calculated by combining equations 6.2 and 6.3.
(6.4) 
Where  T_{m}  :  Maximum crop transpiration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
ET0  :  Potential evapotranspiration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
k_{gb}  :  Extinction coefficient for global radiation  []  
LAI  :  Leaf area index (see Section 5.5.5.)  [ha ha^{1}] 
(6.5) 
Where  k_{gb}  :  Extinction coefficient for global radiation  [] 
k_{df}  :  Extinction coefficient for diffuse light  [] 
(6.6) 
Where  E_{w,max}  :  Maximum evaporation rate from a shaded water surface  [cm d^{1}] 
E0_{w}  :  Potential evaporation rate from a water surface (see Section 4.1.4.)  [cm d^{1}]  
k_{gb}  :  Extinction coefficient for global radiation  []  
LAI  :  Leaf area index  [ha ha^{1}] 
(6.7) 
Where  E_{s,max}  :  Maximum evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface  [cm d^{1}] 
E0_{s}  :  Potential evaporation rate from a bare soil surface  [cm d^{1}]  
k_{gb}  :  Extinction coefficient for total global radiation  []  
LAI  :  Leaf area index  [ha ha^{1}] 
Reduction of the transpiration due to water stress
(6.8) 
Where  R_{ws}  :  Reduction factor for transpiration in case of water shortage  [] 
q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content (see eq. 6.1 and 6.34)  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{wp}  :  Soil moisture content at wilting point  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{ws}  :  Critical soil moisture  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
(6.9) 
Where  q_{ws}  :  Critical soil moisture content  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
p  :  Soil water depletion fraction as a function of pot. evapotranspiration  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{fc}  :  Soil moisture content at field capacity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{wp}  :  Soil moisture content at wilting point  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
ET0 in cm d1  
crop group  0.2  0.3  0.4  0.5  0.6  0.7  0.8  0.9  1.0 
1  0.45  0.38  0.30  0.25  0.23  0.20  0.18  0.16  0.15 
2  0.60  0.50  0.43  0.35  0.30  0.28  0.25  0.23  0.20 
3  0.75  0.65  0.55  0.45  0.40  0.38  0.33  0.30  0.25 
4  0.85  0.75  0.65  0.55  0.50  0.48  0.43  0.38  0.35 
5  0.92  0.85  0.75  0.65  0.60  0.55  0.50  0.48  0.45 
Table 6.2. Example of crops in the different crop groups (Doorenbos et al., 1978).
1  leaf vegetables, strawberry  12  cabbage, onion 
2  clover, carrot, early tobacco  23  banana, pepper 
3  grape, pea, potato  34  bean, sunflower, tomato, water melon, grass 
4  citrus, groundnut, pineapple  45  alfalfa cotton, tobacco, cassava, sweet potato, grains 
5  olive, safflower, sorghum, soybean, sugarcane 
The soil water depletion fraction for very high values of potential evapotranspiration of a closed canopy can be as low as 0.10. For very low values of potential evapotranspiration of a closed canopy this fraction can reach 0.96. Note that the reduction factor R_{ws} (eq. 6.8) may obtain values higher than unity and lower than zero for certain values of p and q_{t}. Since this does not make any sense, in WOFOST/CGMS the highest possible value for R_{ws} is set to unity and the lowest possible value to zero. An empirical formula can be used to calculate the fraction of easily available soil water, yielding identical values as the ones given in the Table 6.1. (van Diepen et al., 1988).
(6.10) 
where  p  :  Fraction of easily available soil water  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
a_{p}  :  Regression constant (=0.76 van Diepen et al., 1988)  []  
b_{p}  :  Regression constant (=1.5 van Diepen et al., 1988)  [d cm^{1}]  
ET0  :  Potential evapotranspiration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
No_{cg}  :  Crop Group number (=1 to 5, Doorenbos et al., 1978)  [] 
Note that crop group number, No_{cg} should be provided by the user. For crop group 1 and 2 this estimate is not very accurate and an additional correction is applied to reproduce the table values correctly (van Diepen et al., 1988):
(6.11) 
where  p  :  Fraction of easily available soil water  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
ET0  :  Potential evapotranspiration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
No_{cg}  :  Crop Group number (=1 to 5, Doorenbos et al., 1978)  [] 
Reduction of the transpiration due to oxygen stress
The plant transpiration rate can also be reduced when the rootzone is completely saturated. Root systems which have been developed in aerobic soils do not have airducts and degenerate within several days when anaerobic conditions (waterlogging) are imposed (Penning de Vries et al., 1989). Flooding quickly depletes the O_{2} in the soil and root cells disintegrate when their metabolic activities are hampered by oxygen depletion. For detailed information on the physiological effects of excess water on a crop see Jackson and Drew (1984).Transpiration reduction occurs when the actual soil moisture content exceeds the critical soil moisture content for aeration. The critical soil moisture content for aeration can be calculated as:
(6.12) 
Where  q_{air}  :  Critical soil moisture content for aeration  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{c}  :  Critical air content  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
The soil porosity, q_{max}, and the critical soil air content, q_{c}, are soil specific and should be provided by the user. In WOFOST/CGMS maximum reduction is reached after four successive days of anaerobic conditions. In reality however, this period depends on the development stage and species. The transpiration rate reduction factor due to oxygen shortage can be calculated as (van Diepen, personal communication):
(6.13a) 

(6.13b) 
Where  R_{os,max}  :  Maximum reduction factor due to oxygen shortage  [] 
R_{os}  :  Reduction factor due to oxygen shortage  []  
q_{air}  :  Critical soil moisture content for aeration  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content (see eq. 6.34)  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
No_{d}  :  Number of successive days with oxygen stress  [] 
For crops which roots develop airducts (e.g rice) and for
crops grown on perfectly drained land, the reduction factor for oxygen
shortage equals unity. If this ratio is less then unity, the actual transpiration
rate is reduced proportionally.
Usually, in freely draining soils oxygen stress does not play any role.
However, it may occur when (i) the critical soil moisture content for aeration is greater
than the soil moisture content at field capacity, when (ii) the subsoil is
very slowly permeable and when (iii) a high groundwater table occurs (in this in case oxygen shortage
may occur regularly). However, the process of transpiration reduction due
oxygen shortage is poorly parametrized and values for the reduction
factor are rather speculative.
Actual transpiration
As a result of water excess and/or water shortage the actual transpiration rate can be calculated as:
(6.14) 
Where  T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
T_{m}  :  Maximum transpiration rate (see eq. 6.4)  [cm d^{1}]  
R_{os}  :  Reduction factor due to oxygen reduction  []  
R_{ws}  :  Reduction factor due to water shortage (see eq. 6.8)  [] 
6.2. Soil water balance calculations, potential production
To quantify the crop water requirements for continuous growth without drought stress (i.e. assuming that the soil is permanently at field capacity) the variables of the soil water balance in the potential production situation are calculated.
(6.15) 
Where  q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
q_{fc}  :  Soil moisture content at field capacity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
Rainfall, irrigation, capillary rise and drainage are not taken into account. This does not mean that these processes will not occur. The result of these processes will be a soil moisture content at field capacity level. The only two processes to consider are surface evaporation and crop transpiration (see the previous sections).
The evaporation rate is calculated for two situations:
 Airducts are present in the roots and the crop tolerates waterlogging (e.g. rice). The evaporation rate is then calculated as the evaporation rate from a shaded water surface:
 Airducts are absent in the roots and the crop does not tolerate water logging (most crops). The evaporation rate is calculated as the evaporation rate from a soil surface (van Diepen, personal communication):
(6.16) 
Where  E_{w}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded water surface  [cm d^{1}] 
E_{w,max}  :  Maximum evaporation rate from shaded water surface (see eq. 6.6)  [cm d^{1}] 
(6.17) 
Where  E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface  [cm d^{1}] 
E_{s,max}  :  Maximum evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface (see eq. 6.7)  [cm d^{1}]  
q_{fc}  :  Soil moisture content at field capacity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{wp}  :  Soil moisture content at wilting point  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
6.3. System without groundwater influence
In subroutine Calculate, the variables of the soil water balance
in the actual waterlimited production situation are calculated for freely
draining soil. No influence from groundwater is assumed and crop water
requirements for continuous growth with either drought stress or water
excess and a possible reduction of the crop transpiration rate,
leading to a reduced growth are quantified.
6.3.1. The soil water submodel
For the rooted zone the water balance equation is solved every daily time step. The water balance is driven by rainfall, possibly buffered as surface storage, and evapotranspiration. The processes considered are infiltration, soil water retention, percolation and the loss of water beyond the maximum root zone. At the upper boundary, processes comprise infiltration of water from precipitation or irrigation, evaporation from the soil surface and crop transpiration. If the rainfall intensity exceeds the infiltration and surface storage capacity of the soil, water runs off. Water can be stored in the soil till the field capacity is reached. Additional water percolates beyond the lower boundary of the rooting zone. Flow rates are limited by the maximum percolation rate of the root zone and the maximum percolation rate to the subsoil. The textural profile of the soil is conceived homogeneous. Initially the soil profile consists of three layers (zones):
 the rooted zone between soil surface and actual rooting depth
 the lower zone between actual rooting depth and maximum rooting depth
 the subsoil below maximum rooting depth
6.3.2. Elements of the water balance
Initial soil water content and initial soil water amount
The initial value of the actual soil moisture content in the root zone can be calculated as:
(6.18) 
Where  q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content in rooted zone  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
q_{wp}  :  Soil moisture content at wilting point  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
W_{av}  :  Initial available soil moisture amount in excess of q_{wp}  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth (see Section 5.6.)  [cm] 
The initial actual soil moisture content, q_{t}, cannot be lower than the soil moisture content at wilting point. In case the crop cannot develop airducts, the initial soil moisture content cannot be higher than the soil moisture content at field capacity. If the crop can develop airducts the initial soil moisture content cannot exceed the soil porosity. W_{av}, the initial available soil moisture amount in excess of q_{wp} should be provided by the user. Multiplying the actual soil moisture content with the rooting depth yields the initial water amount in the rooted zone. The initial amount of soil moisture in the zone between the actual rooting depth and the maximum rooting depth (i.e. lower zone), can be calculated as:
(6.19) 
Where  W_{lz}  :  Soil moisture amount in the lower zone  [cm] 
W_{av}  :  Initial available soil moisture amount in excess of q_{wp}  [cm]  
RD_{max}  :  Maximum rooting depth  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content in rooted zone  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{wp}  :  Soil moisture content at wilting point  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
The soil moisture content of the lower zone is also limited by the field
capacity in case the crop cannot develop airducts, else the soil moisture
content is limited by the soil porosity. In WOFOST/CGMS, the variable
D_{slr}, days since last rain, is initially set to one. If the actual soil
moisture content is halfway between the field capacity and wilting point
a value of five days is assumed.
Evaporation
Evaporation depends on the available soil water and the infiltration capacity of the soil. If the water layer on the surface, the so called surface storage, exceeds 1 cm, the actual evaporation rate from the soil is set to zero and the actual evaporation rate from the surface water is equal to the maximum evaporation from a shaded water surface. If the surface storage is less than 1 cm and the infiltration rate of the previous day exceeds 1 cm d^{1}, the actual evaporation rate from the surface water is set to zero and the actual evaporation rate from the soil is equal to the maximum evaporation from a shaded soil surface. All water on the surface can infiltrate within one day. The value of the variable days since last rain, D_{slr}, is reset to unity. If the infiltration rate is less than 1 cm d^{1}, the amount of infiltrated water is considered too small to justify a reset of the parameter D_{slr} and the evaporation rate decreases as the top soil starts drying. The reduction of the evaporation is thought to be proportional to the square root of time (Stroosnijder, 1987, 1982). The evaporation can be calculated as:
(6.20) 
where  E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface  [cm d^{1}] 
E_{s,max}  :  Maximum evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface (see eq. 6.7)  [cm d^{1}]  
D_{slr}  :  Days since last rain  [d] 
When a small water amount has infiltrated, or rather wetted the soil
surface, this amount can be evaporated the same day, irrespective of D_{slr}.
Therefore, the actual evaporation from the soil surface, as calculated
according to equation 6.20, should be corrected for this water amount
infiltrating the soil. This amount should be added to the actual evaporation
rate. However, it should be noted that the actual evaporation can never
exceed the maximum evaporation rate.
Precipitation
Not all precipitation will reach the surface. A fraction will be intercepted by leaves, stems, etc. From the amount of precipitation which reaches the soil surface, a part runs off. Runoff from a field can be 020 percent, and even higher on unfavorable surfaces (Stroosnijder & Koné, 1982). WOFOST/CGMS assumes that a fixed fraction of the precipitation will not infiltrate during that particular day. This fraction can be reduced in situations with relatively small amounts of rainfall. The reduction factor is defined as function of the rainfall amount (van Diepen et al., 1988). See figure 6.2 and equation 6.26. Note that the non infiltrating fraction refers to rainfall only. Irrigation water is assumed to infiltrate freely (the irrigation option is not implemented in WOFOST/CGMS).
Percolation
If the root zone soil moisture content is above field capacity, water percolates to the lower part of the potentially rootable zone and the subsoil. A clear distinction is made between percolation from the actual rootzone to the socalled lower zone, and percolation from the lower zone to the subsoil. The former is called Perc and the latter is called Loss. The percolation rate from the rooted zone can be calculated as:
(6.21) 
where  Perc  :  Percolation rate from the root zone to the lower zone  [cm d^{1}] 
W_{rz}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone (see eq. 6.33a)  [cm]  
W_{rz,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount in the root zone (see eq. 6.22)  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate (see eq. 6.14)  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface (see eq. 6.7 and 6.20)  [cm d^{1}] 
The equilibrium soil moisture amount in the root zone can be calculated as the soil moisture content at field capacity times the depth of the rooting zone:
(6.22) 
where  W_{rz,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount in the root zone  [cm] 
q_{fc}  :  Soil moisture content at field capacity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm] 
The percolation rate and infiltration rate are limited by the conductivity of the wet soil, which is soil specific and should be given by the user. Note that the percolation from the root zone to the lower zone can be limited by the uptake capacity of the lower zone. Therefore, the value calculated with equation 6.21 is preliminary and the uptake capacity should first be checked. The percolation from the lower zone to the subsoil, the socalled Loss, should take the water amount in the lower zone into account. If the water amount in the lower zone is less than the equilibrium soil moisture amount, a part of the percolating water will be retained and the percolation rate will be reduced. Water loss from the lower end of the maximum root zone can be calculated as:
(6.23) 
where  Loss  :  Percolation rate from the lower zone to the subsoil  [cm d^{1}] 
Perc  :  Percolation rate from root zone to lower zone (see eq. 6.21)  [cm d^{1}]  
W_{lz}  :  Soil moisture amount in the lower zone (see eq. 6.33b)  [cm]  
W_{lz,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount in the lower zone (see eq. 6.24)  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step 
Water loss from the potentially rootable zone, is also limited by the maximum percolation rate of the subsoil, which is soil specific and should be provided by the user. The equilibrium soil moisture amount in the lower zone can be calculated as the soil moisture content at field capacity times the root zone depth:
(6.24) 
where  W_{rz,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount in the lower zone  [cm] 
q_{fc}  :  Soil moisture content at field capacity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
RD_{max}  :  Maximum rooting depth  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm] 
For rice an additional limit of five percent of the saturated soil conductivity is set to account for puddling (a rather arbitrary value, which may be easily changed in the program). The saturated soil conductivity and is calculated using equating 6.67 with pF= 1.0 (i.e. a hydraulic head of 0.1 cm). The percolation rate from the lower zone to the sub soil is not to exceed this value (van Diepen et al., 1988). As mentioned before, the value calculated with equation 6.21, should be regarded as preliminary; the storage capacity of the receiving layer may become limiting. The storage capacity of the lower zone, also called the uptake capacity, is the amount of air plus the loss (van Diepen et al., 1988). It can de defined as:
(6.25) 
where  UP  :  Uptake capacity of lower zone  [cm d^{1}] 
RD_{max}  :  Maximum rooting depth  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
W_{lz}  :  Soil moisture amount in lower zone  [cm]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity (maximum soil moisture)  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d]  
Loss  :  Percolation rate from the lower zone to the subsoil  [cm d^{1}] 
Percolation to the lower part of the potentially rootable zone can
not exceed the uptake capacity of the lower zone. Therefore the percolation
rate is set equal to the minimum of the calculated percolation rate (eq. 6.21)
and the uptake.
Preliminary infiltration
The infiltration rate depends on the available water and the infiltration capacity of the soil. If the actual surface storage is less then or equal to 0.1 cm, the preliminary infiltration capacity is simply described as:
(6.26) 
where  IN_{p}  :  Preliminary infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
F_{I}  :  Maximum fraction of rain not infiltrating during time step t  []  
C_{I}  :  Reduction factor applied to F_{I} as a function of the precipitation intensity  []  
P  :  Precipitation intensity  [cm d^{1}]  
I_{e}  :  Effective irrigation  [cm d^{1}]  
SS_{t}  :  Surface storage at time step t (see eq. 6.29)  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
The maximum fraction of rain not infiltrating during time step t, F_{I} can be either set to a fixed value or assumed to be variable by multiplying F_{I} with a precipitation dependent reduction factor C_{I} which is maximum for high rainfall and will be reduced for low rainfall. The user should provide F_{I}. The C_{I} table is included in the model and is assumed to be fixed. The calculated infiltration rate is preliminary, as the storage capacity of the soil is not yet taken into account. If the actual surface storage is more than 0.1 cm, the available water which can potentially infiltrate, is equal to the water amount on the surface (i.e. supplied via rainfall/irrigation and depleted via evaporation):
(6.27) 
where  IN_{p}  :  Preliminary infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
P  :  Precipitation intensity  [cm d^{1}]  
I_{e}  :  Effective irrigation  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{w}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded water surface  [cm d^{1}]  
SS_{t}  :  Surface storage at time step t (see eq. 6.29)  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
However, the infiltration rate is hampered by the soil conductivity
and cannot exceed it. Soil conductivity
is soil specific and should be given by the user.
Adjusted infiltration
Total water loss from the root zone can now be calculated as the sum of transpiration, evaporation and percolation. The sum of total water loss and available pore space in the root zone define the maximum infiltration rate. The preliminary infiltration rate cannot exceed this value. The maximum possible infiltration rate is given by:
(6.28) 
where  IN_{max}  :  Maximum infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity (maximum soil moisture)  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate from root zone to lower zone  [cm d^{1}] 
Surface runoff
Surface runoff is also taken into account by defining a maximum value for surface storage. If the surface storage exceeds this value the exceeding water amount will run off. Surface storage at time step t can be calculated as:
(6.29) 
where  SS_{t}  :  Surface storage at time step t  [cm d^{1}] 
P  :  Precipitation intensity  [cm d^{1}]  
I_{e}  :  Effective irrigation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{w}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded water surface  [cm d^{1}]  
IN  :  Infiltration rate (adjusted)  [cm d^{1}] 
Surface runoff can be calculated as:
(6.30) 
where  SR_{t}  :  Surface runoff at time step t  [cm] 
SS_{t}  :  Surface storage at time step t  [cm]  
SS_{max}  :  Maximum surface storage  [cm] 
SS_{max} is an environmental
specific variable and should be provided by the user.
Rates of change and root extension
The rates of change in the water amount in the root and lower zone are calculated straightforward from the flows found above:
(6.31a) 

(6.31b) 
where  DW_{rz}  :  Change of the soil moisture amount in the root zone  [cm] 
DW_{lz}  :  Change of the soil moisture amount in the lower zone  [cm]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate from a shaded soil surface  [cm d^{1}]  
IN  :  Infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate from root zone to lower zone  [cm d^{1}]  
Loss  :  Percolation rate from lower zone to sub soil  [cm d^{1}]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
Due to extension of the roots into the lower zone, extra soil moisture becomes available, which can be calculated as:
(6.32) 
where  RD_{t}  :  Rooting depth at time step t  [cm] 
RD_{t1}  :  Rooting depth at time step t1  [cm]  
RD_{max}  :  Maximum rooting depth  [cm]  
W_{lz}  :  Soil moisture amount in the lower zone (see eq. 6.33b)  [cm]  
DW_{rz}  :  Change of the soil moisture amount in the root zone  [cm]  
DW_{lz}  :  Change of the soil moisture amount in the lower zone  [cm] 
With equation 6.31 the actual water amount in the root zone and in the lower zone can be calculated according to:
(6.33a) 

(6.33b) 
where  W_{rz,t}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone at time step t  [cm] 
W_{lz,t}  :  Soil moisture amount in the lower zone at time step t  [cm]  
W_{rz,t1}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone at time step t1  [cm]  
W_{lz,t1}  :  Soil moisture amount in the lower zone at time step t1  [cm]  
DW_{rz}  :  Rate of change of the soil moisture amount in the root zone  [cm]  
DW_{lz}  :  Rate of change of the soil moisture amount in the lower zone  [cm] 
Actual soil moisture content
The actual soil moisture content can now be calculated according to (see also eq. 6.1):
(6.34) 
where  q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content at time step t  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
W_{rz,t}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone at time step t  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm] 
6.4. Subsystem with groundwater influence
Crop water requirements are quantified for continuous growth with either drought stress or water excess and a possible reduction of the crop transpiration rate, leading to a reduced growth, is quantified. Note that the routines discussed in the following sections are not included in CGMS!6.4.1. Submodel with groundwater influence
The textural soil profile is assumed to be homogeneous and three zones are distinguished:
 the rooted zone between soil surface and actual rooting depth
 the zone between rooting depth and groundwater
 the soil below groundwater level to a reference depth of 1000 centimeters. This reference depth is used to calculate a system water balance. It is a formal system boundary
The water balance is driven by rainfall, possibly buffered as surface storage and evapotranspiration. The processes considered are infiltration, soil water retention, the steady state flow between the root zone and the groundwater table (capillary rise() or percolation(), and drainage rate. An irrigation term is included but not used. The resulting depth, moisture and air contents in the root zone are calculated. Calculation of the evaporation rate, the preliminary infiltration rate, precipitation, surface storage and runoff is similar to the system without groundwater influence (see prevous sections).
Groundwater influence is taken into account by calculation of capillary rise assuming a stationary situation and homogeneous soil. The time step of one day implies that some of the calculated flow rates may result in moisture contents exceeding the total pore space. This clearly sets a limit to the values of these rates of change. As a consequence, the model has more or less the character of a bookkeeping system. The rate of capillary rise or percolation determine the change in groundwater level. The new groundwater level is thus estimated from the calculated capillary rise or percolation. The soil moisture profile in the soil between groundwater and rooted zone, is assumed to be again in equilibrium. (in fact a contradiction with capillary rise or percolation). Difficulty arises when the groundwater rises into the rooted zone. The following procedure is then applied:
 To simplify the calculations, it is assumed that in the current time step the groundwater can rise until the lower boundary of the rooted zone at its highest level.
 Soil air content of the rooted zone is calculated in next step. If the water amount in the rooted zone increases, a lower, saturated layer and a higher layer with the original air content and soil moisture content are assumed and the groundwater table is situated at the boundary between these zones. The root zone may be completely filled (groundwater level equals zero).
 Water loss from the rooted zone implies a rise of the groundwater level and the increase of soil moisture in the zone between groundwater and root zone is considered as capillary rise. At the other hand the groundwater level may drop below the rooted zone due to water loss.
 waterlogging occurs (i.e. groundwater depth less then 10 cm) and the plants cannot form airducts.
 plants can form airducts but waterlogging prevails for more then ten consecutive days.
6.4.2. Root extension and the actual soil moisture content
The elements of the water balance have to be established before the
actual soil moisture content can be calculated. In the following
paragraph percolation, capillary rise, adjusted infiltration
and actual soil moisture amount are discussed. The new level of the groundwater
table, which is needed to calculate the capillary rise, is also
established. The effect of root extension will be explained at
the end of this paragraph.
Initialization
Some remarks have to be made on the initialization: the soil moisture content values at field capacity, wilting point and the soil porosity are derived from the water retention curve, q _{log(y)} (see eq. 6.38). An AFGEN table with the ^{10}log of the matric head (pF) as independent variable is used to describe this curve. The water retention curve is soil specific and should be provided by the user. Soil moisture content at field capacity, q_{fc}, soil moisture content at wilting point, q _{wp} and soil porosity, q_{max} are established using the AFGEN table mentioned above with a matric head of 200 cm, 16000 cm and 0.1 cm respectively. In WOFOST a pF table is constructed as the inverse of q _{log(y)}.
First, a table with values of the cumulative soil air volume above the groundwater level at equilibrium is calculated. Under equilibrium conditions, the matric head values are numerically equal to the height at which they occur. With soil air volume, the cumulative air amount as a function of height above groundwater under equilibrium conditions is meant. Values of the cumulative air amount for the following values of height (matric head, also called soil suction): 0,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,..,16384 cm are calculated and put into an AFGEN table. To calculate the cumulative air amount, the soil air content has to be integrated over the intervals mentioned above. The three point Gaussian integration method is used in the model. Length of the integration interval is given by:
(6.35) 
where  Dy  :  Height of interval matric head  [cm] 
y_{0}  :  Lower boundary interval matric head  [cm]  
y_{1}  :  Upper boundary interval matric head  [cm] 
Within each interval, three points are selected and used by the Gaussian integration, to integrate over the interval are given by:
(6.36) 
where  y_{i}  :  Matric head  [cm] 
p  :  Three points for Gaussian integration  [] 
Average air content for the selected matric head can be calculated as:
(6.37) 
where  q_{air,yi}  :  Air content at selected matric head  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{yi}  :  Actual soil moisture content as a function of matric head  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
The actual soil moisture content can be derived as a function of the selected matric head using the soil specific water retention curve:
(6.38) 
where  q_{yi}  :  Actual soil moisture content as a function of matric head  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
Dy  :  Height of interval matric head  [cm]  
y_{0}  :  Lower boundary interval matric head  [cm] 
With equations 6.35, 6.36, 6.37 and 6.38, the cumulative air amount as a function of height above groundwater under equilibrium conditions can now be calculated as:
(6.39) 
where  A_{air}(h)  :  Air amount as a function of height (h) above groundwater table  [cm] 
Dy  :  Height of interval matric head  [cm]  
q_{air,p}  :  Air content at selected matric head p=1,0,1  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
The AFGEN table, the matric head (or height above groundwater) as a function of the cumulative air amount, y(A_{air}), is also calculated. It is the inverse of the table calculated above.
With equation 6.39, the soil air amount above the water table at equilibrium, the initial state variables of the water balance can be computed. These are, the equilibrium moisture amount in the subsoil, in the root zone and the zone above the drains up to the surface. Before this can be done however, the soil air volume below the rooted zone, in the root zone and above the drains up to the surface has to be established. To estimate the air amount at a specific depth at equilibrium, the height of that specific level above soil water table is used. It is assumed that in the rootzone no gradient exists.
The equilibrium moisture amount in the subsoil, the root zone and above the drains up to the surface can than be calculated as:
where:  (6.40a) 

where:  (6.40b) 

where:  (6.40c) 
where  W_{ss,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount below rooted zone  [cm] 
W_{rz,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount in rooted zone  [cm]  
W_{dd,fc}  :  Equilibrium soil moisture amount above the drains up to the surface  [cm]  
A_{air}(h)  :  Air amount as a function of height above groundwater table (see eq. 6.39)  [cm]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
DD  :  Drain depth  [cm]  
Z_{t}  :  Depth of groundwater table at time step t  [cm] 
The initial moisture content in the rooted zone is assumed
to be equal to the equilibrium moisture amount in the root zone if the
groundwater level is within 100 cm from the root zone or even in the root
zone. If the groundwater level is lower than 100 cm below the root zone
the initial moisture content in the rooted zone is calculated as the soil
moisture at field capacity. The variable days since last rain, D_{slr},
which is used to calculate the evaporation rate from a shaded soil (see
eq. 6.20), is set to unity. In case the soil moisture is lower than pF
3.0, a value of five days is assumed.
Capillary rise and percolation
If the groundwater level is within the root zone, capillary rise and percolation are set to zero and no capillary rise or percolation has to be calculated. If the groundwater level is below the root zone, both capillary rise and percolation are calculated. The capillary flow from groundwater to the root zone is calculated from the pF of the root zone, the height difference between the lower boundary of the root zone and the groundwater depth and the table of the hydraulic conductivity. The pF can be derived via interpolation from the soil specific water retention curve. Because of its complex calculations, capillary flow is discussed separately in Section 6.5..
For sandy soils, a shallow groundwater depth and a shallow root zone, the capillary flow may be so large that the system becomes unstable. Therefore, the calculated flow rate is limited to the flow rate that would exist in a state of equilibrium with the groundwater level, which can be calculated as:
(6.41) 
where  CR_{max}  :  Maximum flow rate calculated at equilibrium  [cm d^{1}] 
W_{rz,fc}  :  Equilibrium water amount in the rooted zone (see eq. 6.40b)  [cm]  
W_{rz}  :  Actual water amount in the rooted zone (see eq. 6.55)  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
A positive flow rate is defined as capillary rise whereas a negative
flow rate is considered as percolation. For rice crops the percolation
is limited to 5% of the estimated soil specific hydraulic conductivity,
to account for the effect of puddling. This is a rather arbitrary value.
Drainage
The drainage rate is calculated only if there artificial drainage exists and if the groundwater level is above the drainage depth. For other cases the drainage depth is set to zero. The drainage rate depends on the drainable water amount and the drainage system capacity. This capacity is calculated first accorrding to (van Diepen et al., 1988):
(6.42) 
where  DR_{max}  :  Maximum drainage rate, equal to the drainage capacity  [cm d^{1}] 
K0  :  Hydraulic conductivity at saturation  [cm d^{1}] 
The hydraulic conductivity at saturation, K0
is soil specific and is calculated using equating 6.67 with
pF= 1.0 (i.e. a matric head of 0.1 cm). If the groundwater table is below
the root zone the drainable water amount equals the water amount
water between the drains and the root zone minus the equilibrium amount
which corresponds with the groundwater level at drainage depth. It is assumed that the drainage rate is always positive or zero (in
case RD > DD and W_{rz} < W_{dd,fc}).
The drain depth, should be given be the
user. The drainage rate can be calculated as:
(6.43) 
where  DR  :  Drainage rate  [cm d^{1}] 
W_{rz}  :  Water amount in the root zone (see eq. 6.55)  [cm]  
DD  :  Drain depth  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
W_{dd,fc}  :  Water amount above drains (see eq. 6.40c)  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
For groundwater located within the root zone the drainable water amount equals the water content of the root zone plus the water content of the (saturated) zone between the drains and the rootzone, minus the equilibrium water amount above the drains. The drainage rate can be calculated as:
(6.44) 
where  DR  :  Drainage rate  [cm d^{1}] 
h_{2}  :  Z_{t}  RD  [cm]  
h_{1}  :  DD  RD  [cm]  
A_{air}(h)  :  Air amount as a function of height above groundwater table (see eq. 6.39)  [cm]  
DD  :  Drain depth  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
Z_{t}  :  Groundwater table depth at time step t  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
Note that the drainage rate cannot exceed the drainage capacity of the system (eq. 6.42)
Change of groundwater depth and adjustment of infiltration rate
In the following text, the change of the groundwater and the adjustment of the infiltration rate will be discussed. Two different situations can be distinguished.
 Groundwater table below the rooted zone
 Groundwater table within the rooted zone
Groundwater table below rootzone
Now the change in groundwater depth and the infiltration rate can be adjusted. If the groundwater level is below the root zone the calculation is simple. From the drainage rate, the rate of capillary rise and/or percolation rate, the new air amount between root zone and groundwater can be found:
(6.45) 
where  A_{new}  :  New air amount between root zone and groundwater level  [cm] 
A_{air}(h)  :  Air amount as a function of height above groundwater table (see eq. 6.39)  [cm]  
h  :  Z_{t}  RD  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
Z_{t}  :  Depth of groundwater table at time step t  [cm]  
DR  :  Drainage rate  [cm d^{1}]  
CR  :  Rate of capillary rise (see Section 6.5.)  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}] 
To simplify calculations, the groundwater is not allowed to enter the root zone in the current time step. This may happen when the new air amount between groundwater and root zone, A_{new}, becomes negative. The groundwater level is allowed to rise maximally till the lower boundary of the root zone (A_{new}=0). In the next time step the groundwater may rise further. Therefore, the percolation rate is constrained to prevent such an occasion.
(6.46) 
where  Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}] 
A_{new}  :  New air amount between root zone and groundwater table  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d] 
The definitive percolation value is now known and used to constrain the maximum possible infiltration rate (to prevent an over saturated root zone), which equals the available soil air volume:
(6.47) 
where  IN_{max}  :  Maximum infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
q_{t}  :  Soil moisture content (see eq. 6.56)  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate of shaded soil surface  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
CR  :  Rate of capillary rise  [cm d^{1}] 
The root zone soil moisture content is limited to a value just below saturation to prevent zero air content in the root zone, which could lead to problems in the next time step if, at that day, the groundwater enters the rooted zone. The adjusted infiltration rate (see eq. 6.26 and 6.27) is established by limiting the preliminary infiltration to maximum possible infiltration rate.
The equilibrium profile is assumed and the new height of the root zone above the groundwater level (i.e. matric head at the root tip) can now be obtained from the relation between height above the groundwater table and the cumulative air amount y(A_{air}), by introducing the new air amount between the root zone and the groundwater level, A_{new}, into this relation. Adding the actual rooting depth, RD, yields the groundwater depth. The rate of change of the groundwater level is found by subtracting the old value of the groundwater depth from the new value.
(6.48) 
where  DZ  :  Change in groundwater level per time step  [cm d^{1}] 
y()  :  Matric head as a function of the air amount  [cm]  
A_{new}  :  New air amount between root zone and groundwater level (see eq. 6.45)  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
Z_{t1}  :  Depth of groundwater table at time step t1  [cm] 
The initial groundwater depth should
be provided by the user.
Groundwater table within the rooted zone
When groundwater enters the rooted zone, the air concentration in the root zone is calculated. Percolation is assumed to equal the maximum drainage rate. The root zone is divided into a part saturated with water and an unsaturated part. The initial air concentration is maintained in the unsaturated part. This implies that an increase of the water content leads to a shallower unsaturated part and hence to a rising groundwater level.
This rather artificial construction is necessary because of the interdependence of the water content and the groundwater depth. In this system the relation between water content and groundwater depth is (van Diepen et al., 1988):
(6.49) 
where  Z_{t}  :  Depth of groundwater table at time step t  [cm] 
q_{air,t}  :  Air content above groundwater table  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
W_{t}  :  Water amount in the root zone (see eq. 6.55)  [cm] 
Both sides of the expression are equal to the air amount in the root zone. Note that on the day at which the groundwater enters the root zone, the air content above the groundwater table should assume a nonzero value. This implies that the groundwater may not rise from below the root zone to the soil surface in one time step. Moreover, at the day at which the groundwater enters the root zone, the soil should not be saturated. This is in fact the same condition as the first one.
When the groundwater is within the root zone, the drainage rate is equivalent to the percolation rate. The preliminary infiltration rate (see eq. 6.26 and 6.27) cannot exceed the available soil air volume ("over saturation"). The adjusted infiltration rate is thus established by limiting the preliminary infiltration to the available soil air volume. The maximum value the adjusted infiltration rate can reach is defined as:
(6.50) 
where  IN_{max}  :  Maximum infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
Z_{t}  :  Depth of groundwater table at time step t  [cm]  
q_{air,t}  :  Air content above groundwater table (see eq. 6.49)  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate (see eq. 6.14)  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate of a shaded soil surface (see eq. 6.20)  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}] 
Two different situations are distinguished: (i)during current time step the groundwater stays within the rootzone or (ii) the groundwater level drops below the root zone. When the groundwater table stays within the root zone, the change in groundwater depth can be established with the transpiration, evaporation, percolation and infiltration rates. Transpiration, evaporation and percolation cause an increase of the air amount in the root zone, whereas the infiltration causes a decrease.
(6.50) 
where  DZ  :  Change in groundwater level per time step  [cm d^{1}] 
IN  :  Infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
q_{air,t}  :  Air content above groundwater table  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
When the groundwater level falls below the root zone, water is recovered from the subsoil to maintain a stable moisture content during the transition in the rooted zone. In the water balance of the rooted zone this water amount is accounted for as capillary rise. This rather artificial construction is used because the time step of one day is too large to keep track of fluctations of the groundwater level.
(6.52) 
where  CR  :  Rate of capillary rise  [cm d^{1}] 
DZ  :  Change in groundwater level per time step  [cm d^{1}]  
Z_{t}  :  Depth of groundwater table at time step  [cm d^{1}]  
Dt  :  Time step  [d]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm]  
q_{air,t}  :  Air content above groundwater table  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
The equilibrium profile is assumed again. The new height of the root
zone above the groundwater level can now be obtained from the relation
between height above the groundwater table and the cumulative air amount y(A_{
air}), by introducing CR.Dt, the replaced air amount
between the root zone and the groundwater level, into this relation. and
the rate of change of the groundwater depth can be found by subtracting
the old value of the groundwater depth from the new value (see eq. 6.48).
Moisture amount
The root zone moisture change rate is calculated in a straightforward way from the calculated flow rates:
(6.53) 
where  DW  :  Rate of change in the moisture amount in the root zone  [cm d^{1}] 
T_{a}  :  Actual transpiration rate  [cm d^{1}]  
E_{s}  :  Evaporation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
Perc  :  Percolation rate  [cm d^{1}]  
CR  :  Rate of capillary rise  [cm d^{1}]  
IN  :  Infiltration rate  [cm d^{1}] 
Root extension
As a result of root extension into the lower zone extra soil moisture becomes available, which can be calculated as:
(6.54) 
where  DW_{rz}  :  Change of soil moisture amount in the root zone  [cm] 
RD_{t}  :  Rooting depth at time step t  [cm]  
A_{air}(h)  :  Air amount as a function of height above groundwater table (see eq. 6.39)  [cm]  
Z_{t}  :  Depth of the groundwater table at time step t  [cm]  
q_{max}  :  Soil porosity  [cm^{3} cm^{3}]  
h_{1}  :  Z_{t}  RD_{t}  [cm]  
h_{2}  :  Z_{t1}  RD_{t1}  [cm] 
It is clear that the air amount in the lower zone as well as the equilibrium soil moisture amount below the rooted zone are reduced by the extension of the roots. With equation 6.54 the actual water amount in the root zone and in the lower zone can be calculated according to:
(6.55) 
where  W_{rz,t}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone at time step t  [cm] 
W_{rz,t1}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone at time step t1  [cm]  
DW_{rz}  :  Change of the soil moisture amount in the root zone  [cm] 
Actual soil moisture content
The actual moisture content can now be calculated according to (see also eq. 6.1 and 6.34):
(6.56) 
where  q_{t}  :  Actual soil moisture content at time step t  [cm^{3} cm^{3}] 
W_{rz,t}  :  Soil moisture amount in the root zone at time step t  [cm]  
RD  :  Actual rooting depth  [cm] 
The simulation stops when more
than ten succesive days of waterlogging occur and the crop cannot develop
airducts. Waterlogging is defined as a groundwater depth of
less than 10 cm.
6.5. Calculation of capillary flow
Capillary flow is defined as the flow between the groundwater table and the root zone, whereas percolation is defined as the flow from the root zone to the groundwater. The flow is calculated for a stationary situation, which means that the soil moisture profile does not change within one time step. The basic equation is given by:
(6.57) 
where  FL_{p}  :  Flow rate  [cm d^{1}] 
Z_{rd}  :  Distance between root zone and groundwater table  [cm]  
K  :  Hydraulic conductivity  [cm d^{1}]  
y  :  Matric head  [cm] 
Equation 6.57 can be rewritten according to:
(6.58) 
where  Z_{rd}  :  Distance between root zone and groundwater table  [cm] 
K  :  Hydraulic conductivity  [cm d^{1}]  
y  :  Matric head  [cm]  
FL_{p}  :  Flow rate  [cm d^{1}] 
Between groundwater and rootzone a yprofile
exists. An increase in Z implies an increase in y.
Close to the groundwater the hydraulic conductivity is relatively large
and the ratio K/(K+FL_{p}) is close to unity. At some height above
the groundwater table the hydraulic conductivity becomes smaller and this
ratio starts to decrease fast. Consequently, for a large value of y,
a small increase of groundwater level will lead to large in y.
A stationary soil moisture profile implies a flow rate independent of
the height above the groundwater table. The hydraulic conductivity as a
function of the y is known and
consequently the right hand side of equation 6.58 depends only
on y and can be numerically
integrated over the interval (0y_{rootzone}),
at least, after an estimate of the flow has been made. If the resulting
height difference, Z_{rd}, is equal to the real distance between
rootzone and groundwater, D, the estimated flow is correct. If Z_{rd}
is greater than D, however, the estimated flow is too low and if Z_{rd}
is less than D, the estimated flow is too high. Via an iteration procedure
the value of flow can be adjusted until a satisfactory value is found.
Initialization
The matric head can be calculated from a pF curve using:
(6.59) 
where  y  :  Matric head  [cm] 
pF  :  pF value  [] 
The pF value in equation 6.59 is calculated using the AFGEN table with the soil moisture content as the independent variable (see also Subsection 6.4.2 Initialization). If the calculated matric head is smaller than or equal to zero the hydraulic conductivity is set equal to the saturated conductivity. For these conditions the flow can be calculated as:
(6.60) 
where  FL  :  Flow rate  [cm d^{1}] 
K  :  Hydraulic conductivity  [cm d^{1}]  
y  :  Matric head  [cm]  
D  :  Height difference between the root zone and the groundwater table  [cm] 
Integration
If the calculated matric head is positive, the flow rate has to be derived
by means of an iteration loop. However, first the number and width of the
integration intervals has to be established. The maximum number of integration
intervals equals four, their width's are defined as: [045 cm], [45170
cm], [170330 cm] and [330,y_{rootzone}].
To integrate the last interval, a logarithmic transformation is applied.
This interval is then written as (^{10}log(330),
^{10}log(y_{rootzone})).
If for example the matric head is 220 cm, only three integration intervals
will be included: [045 cm], [45170 cm], [170220 cm]. If the matric head
is larger than 330 cm a fourth integration interval will be included. The
width of the fourth interval will than be calculated as pF minus ^{10}log330.
Using a logarithmic transformation, equation 6.55 becomes:
(6.61) 
where  Z_{rd}  :  Distance between root zone and groundwater table  [cm] 
K  :  Hydraulic conductivity  [cm d^{1}]  
pF  :  pF value  []  
FL_{p}  :  Flow rate  [cm d^{1}] 
The three point Gaussian integration is used for the integration of y over the intervals mentioned above. The length of each integration interval can be expressed as:
(6.62) 
where  Dy  :  Length of the interval matric head  [cm] 
y_{0}  :  Lower boundary interval matric head  [cm]  
y_{1}  :  Upper boundary interval matric head  [cm] 
According to the Gaussian integration method, three distances within the length of the integration interval are selected:
for  p= 1,0,1  (6.63) 
where  y_{i}  :  Matric head  [cm] 
p  :  Three points of the Gaussian integration 
The selected matric head values for Gaussian integration for each integration interval can be calculated as:
(6.64) 
where  y  :  Total selected matric head  [cm] 
y_{0}  :  Lower boundary interval matric head  [cm]  
Dy_{i}  :  Selected matric head  [cm] 
The selected matric head values can be expressed as pFvalues according:
(6.65) 
where  pF  :  pFvalue  [] 
y  :  Matric head  [cm] 
For the fullwidth integration intervals, the selected matric head values
and therefore the selected pFvalues will always be the same. With the
equations 6.62, 6.63 and 6.64, the three selected matric heads per interval
for the Gaussian integration can be calculated. With the help of equation
6.65, the pFvalues for the fullwidth integration intervals can be calculated.
The results are presented in Table 6.3.
Table 6.3. pF values of the selected matric heads per interval.


[0, 45]  0.705143  1.352183  1.601282 
[45, 170]  1.771497  2.031409  2.192880 
[170, 330]  2.274233  2.397940  2.494110 
To diminish calculation time the pFvalues for the full width integration intervals should be included. For different integration intervals the calculations are the same. For the last interval, as mentioned before, a logarithmic transformation is applied. Instead of matric head values, now three pF values are selected, using the Gaussian integration method.
for  p= 1,0,1  (6.66) 
where  pF_{i}  :  pF value  [] 
p  :  Three points of the Gaussian integration 
As mentioned earlier, first the intervals have to be selected. For these intervals, for every selected hydraulic head or pFvalue three per interval), the hydraulic conductivity is computed using the following equation:
(6.67) 
where  K  :  Hydraulic conductivity  [cm d^{1}] 
K(pF)  :  ^{10}log of hydraulic conductivity as a function of pF  [] 
The ^{10}log of hydraulic conductivity as a function of pF,
K(pF), is soil specific and should be provided
by the user.
The values of K, calculated with equation 6.67, are needed in the iteration
loop to calculate (K+FL_{p}), the denominator of equation 6.58.
The nominator of the righthand side of equation 6.58 is
integrated using the Gaussian integration. Therefore, the K values are
multiplied by the size of the interval (DY)
and by the weighing factor. The results are put in a
help array.
Iteration
In order to find the correct flow rate in the iteration process, an upper limit and a lower limit have to be established. The actual flow rate lies somewhere in between. The upper limit of the flow rate is set to 1.27 cm d^{1} and lower limit for the flow rate can be set as:
(6.68) 
where  FL_{l}  :  Lower limit for the flow rate  [cm d^{1}] 
K(pF)  :  Hydraulic conductivity as a function of the pF  [] 
The estimated flow rate is chosen halfway between the upper and lower limit. After the flow rate estimation, the iteration process starts. The calculated height above the groundwater table is compared with the real distance between root zone and groundwater. Depending on the outcome, either the upper limit or the lower limit is adjusted, and the process starts again. If the absolute error is smaller then 0.01 and the relative error smaller than 0.1, the iteration is terminated. The iteration is limited to a maximum of 15 steps.
It is assumed that the rate of capillary rise is never higher than 1.27 cm d^{1}. If the matric head is smaller than the depth of the groundwater level, the upper limit for the flow rate is set to zero. If the matric head is larger than the groundwater depth the lower limit is set to zero. If the matric head is equal to the depth of the groundwater both, upper and lower limit are set to zero and therefore the flow rate equals zero.
hosted by Sudus Internet  powered by cmsGear
copyright 2022 Supit.net